A new society - Policing.
It would be naive to believe that all economic and social problems would be eliminated in a new society. Some problems may disappear quickly, some may linger for a time, and we can be sure that some entirely new problems will arise sooner or later.
We must always be vigilant and prepared to deal with them.
If the new society could be really democratic and open minded, if it could allow the birth and existence of new ideas and movements, and if it would allow the development of those movements that are progressive, then such a society would have built in a mechanism for a conscious and continuous slow evolution, and the need for policing and repression would tend to diminish.
Human beings are neither completely good nor bad, and the new society will not change that.
All that we can do is to promote an economic and social environment that will favour the development of the good rather than the negative features of Human nature. To this effect education and, above all, example are of primary importance. It seems that there will always be some need for preventing and policing crime, and for reforming or punishing those who violate the Golden Rule.
As a guarantee that the power that this task involves should not be abused, it should not be entrusted to persons that may become entrenched and corrupted.
The best guarantee for personal freedom and Human rights is that they should be guarded by each and every individual in the society, under the supervision of elected competent councils or committees. Every person from childhood should be thought the Golden Rule and the principle of Human Rights. Everyone should take responsibility for his own actions; from the lowest level to the highest of decision making, the higher the level the more severe the punishment for transgression.
Nothing comes freely; in one way or another we must pay with our own efforts for every improvement in the society, including the guarantee of our liberty.
It is my opinion that policing should never become a way of life for any person in a democratic society. Therefore, we cannot delegate the care and protection of our liberty to any entrenched professional minority. Every person in the society in turn, at one stage or another, should give some of his time to the task of policing, whether within one's own community or within another.
This could minimize the obvious danger that an entrenched professional force could pose to a democracy. This could also be an incentive for those who are temporarily entrusted with the task of policing to treat the public as they would like to be treated themselves when not on such duty. Similarly, the public would have the same incentive in regards to them.